A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z 

Massachusetts making fast food fitter

Sadly, it may not come as a shock to discover that more than one-third of U.S. adults (that’s 72 million people!), and 16 percent of U.S. children are not just overweight, but obese, as reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In an attempt to combat these frightening statistics, Massachusetts is preparing to administer some of the most stringent restaurant menu labeling rules in the country on Wednesday, which will require fast-food chains to list how many calories are in the food they sell.

According to Fox News, the state’s Public Health Council will vote on Wednesday whether to make fast-food chains list the calorie counts of their menu items on their menus or menu boards.

Many expect these regulations to be more comprehensive than the ones California took on last September when it became the first U.S. state with menu labeling rules for fast-food chains like McDonald’s and Yum Brands’ KFC.

These rules may be coming at just the right time. Obesity has only grown in the U.S. in recent years. Regulations designed with intentions of allowing people to make better-informed decisions about the foods they eat could only provide benefits to the country at large.

In Massachusetts alone, more than half of the adults are overweight or obese, as reported by a 2008 state report that also showed adult obesity had doubled in 20 years.

New York also added a restaurant calorie information rule last year. Now more than a dozen states are considering similar provisions.

Unlike the California regulations, Massachusetts will include items at restaurant drive-through windows, where about 65 percent of fast food is purchased, according to ValueTheMeal.org, which has the most up to date draft of the rules.

Another difference between the two states and their menu regulations is that Massachusetts will not override rules in cities that impose stricter labeling rules at fast-food restaurants. In California, as an example, menu labeling rules passed in San Francisco, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties were dubbed null and void by the state law.

But what about the rights of the restaurants and their owners? Indeed, some restaurant companies have objected to additional government regulations. In New York City, Fox News pointed out, some have fought against the menu labeling rules with lawsuits. Other chains instead support what is known as the “Lean Act,” which would require restaurants and grocery stores that serve prepared food to post calorie counts on menus, menu boards or in other similar ways.

This proposed legislation sounds great, right? But what if the restaurants or grocery stores put that information on the back of a menu or in some place that people wouldn’t normally look? Information like that is easily hidden. With more and more people dining out these days, it’s important that this information is easily accessible and easily visible to consumers.

With obesity in this country busting with our growing pant sizes, a real obesity epidemic, regulations like those imposed in California and those about to be released in Massachusetts could certainly help us cut calories. It’s one thing not knowing about what that Quarter Pounder with cheese really has in it before you discover it’s actually 510 calories, 210 of those from fat, 1.5 grams of trans fat… Certainly, that would deter most people, and that’s not even considering the often accompanying regular French fry at 380 calories or the medium Coke at 210 calories. (This is all thanks to the nutrition facts McDonald’s has made available online. Not a very happy place for those Mickey Dee’s lovers out there.)

The only other point I have to add is that, sadly, the combination of rising food prices and a crumbling U.S. economy doesn’t help the fact that most fast food, such as with McDonald’s Dollar Menu, and most unhealthy food in general, is often the cheapest food to purchase. It could be argued that many families, with the current situation, are forced into eating unhealthy food choices like fast food items.

5 comments so far

It today’s society so many people are faced with the harsh reality that they need two incomes to even have a fighting chance at paying the bills and this is what makes fast food so appealing. Not only is a cheap way to feed your family it is also a quick way since so many families hardly ever make it to the dinner table together.

It sounds like a good idea, sure, but I don’t think many people would even care. People can’t honestly go to McDonald’s expecting to be getting a healthy meal so it would probably be a waste of time.


It’s rather interesting if we turn back the clock and see what life was like back in the ’50s, for instance. Many households were supported by one, yes one, working father. I’m not saying it was easy, but going back to your point, today it’s almost a must for a household to be supported by two working persons. This leads into another huge can of worms when we consider whether or not it’s good that many women have moved from the home and into the working world.

I myself am a woman, and am quite staunch when it comes to gender equality, individualism and independence for women. I just think things should be fair. Anyway, I’m veering a bit. My point is, though I believe very strongly in women’s rights, I also believe that households in the U.S. and in the world have suffered because there’s no “Mom” at home to take care of the children and create a real home environment. I believe families are suffering all over because of this.

Now, I’m not saying it’s a bad thing that women work. Of course not. A woman should have a choice; however, a family does indeed suffer when children are involved and both parents are forced to work. Forced is the keyword here because it’s no longer as accepted or as easy for a household to function without two working adults to support it.

In my opinion, it’s a lose/lose situation we’re dealing with. The current state of the economy is forcing mothers to work. This is sad and it’s tearing us apart. Without strong family units, what else do we have? That is the foundation of our country, and if you haven’t noticed lately, we’re starting to crumble. I believe this is one of many reasons why.

Perhaps I’ll write a story about this in the future.

Thank you for your comment.


I think you make an excellent point. Most people already know about how bad McDonald’s food is. Countless news reports have been done on it. Would publishing the actual numbers really make a difference? I think that’s a good question.

Then there’s those people who really have no choice but to eat food that isn’t as healthy simply because it’s cheaper. They may care, but what other choice do they have? It’s terribly sad.

Andrea’s commet really triggered me in this case. I think this act of showing the nutritional facts on fast food items should be our way of influencing the children in society. If the parents really care about their children they’d take the effort to look over the nutritional facts, nail it into their childrens heads regarding the negative effefts portrayed, and as a result cause them to do what they do best; be influenced. If thir parents explain to them the negative effects/things and refuse to eat it themselves the children will do the same.

Leave a comment


(required but not displayed)

  • Mission Statement

    The staff of Streaming Magazine is dedicated to creating a comprehensive collection of useful articles about health and to the philanthropic concept of an interactive and inclusive dialogue about medical issues and general well-being.

    The articles that appear on Streaming Magazine come from Doctors, Institutions, and Health Organizations from around the world. The information helps readers to help themselves or others, and helps to foster a nurturing environment where support from friends and family is essential.

    Editorial Guidelines Doctors Requirements

  • Archives