<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>26 Magazine &#187; Blogging &amp; Social Networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.26magazine.com/category/internet-business/blogging-and-social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.26magazine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:15:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Criticism of controversy is laughable</title>
		<link>http://www.26magazine.com/criticism-of-controversy-is-laughable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.26magazine.com/criticism-of-controversy-is-laughable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Awesome Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging & Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversial sports writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Whitlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politically correct necessity complex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26magazine.com/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite sports writers does a syndicated piece for Fox Sports and writes often on controversial topics that range from ethnic diversity to marriage, to articles on athletes simply being underachievers.  His articles are filled with substance and good points but are usually marred by the topic itself, with many readers who are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite sports writers does a syndicated piece for Fox Sports and writes often on controversial topics that range from ethnic diversity to marriage, to articles on athletes simply being underachievers.  His articles are filled with substance and good points but are usually marred by the topic itself, with many readers who are blinded by the &#8220;politically correct necessity complex,&#8221; dismissing any of the just statements and label the works as garbage libel.<br />
<br />
I&#8217;m sorry, but he&#8217;s billed as a controversial writer and paid to do exactly that.  He does it with tact and keeps it within the realm of understanding for many who couldn&#8217;t tell the difference between a technical foul or a personal foul.  <br />
<br />
As with many controversial sports writers, Jason Whitlock takes flack for pretty much all he says, and I suppose it&#8217;s to be expected with writing the topics and toeing the line he does, but it would be nice to see the readers actually read his articles and absorb the content instead of reverting to gut reactions to things they may not want to hear.<br />
<br />
<span id="more-531"></span></p>
<p>For example, after Wimbledon, everyone was either talking about Federer being dominant or Serena Williams (maybe) returning to glory.  Whitlock took a different stance and put Serena in a category of underachievers and stated what has been obvious to those who have watched her over the years: she is inconsistent at best and not as dedicated or committed to tennis as any of her competitors.<br />
<br />
Serena was blessed with talent as was her sister.  Together they have dominated doubles tennis, and they&#8217;ve traded blows in the singles realm.  Unlike the men&#8217;s field however, the women&#8217;s field has two big names with several others that seem to win tournaments over the players who out talent them by miles, and in Serena&#8217;s case in particular, it&#8217;s all due to work ethic.  Serena has slacked off and pursued other ventures over the years and she&#8217;s been on and off her game and all over the place.  In the rare cases when she&#8217;s been in top shape, she&#8217;s unstoppable.  When she&#8217;s in great shape, she&#8217;s a competitor.  But most of the time, she&#8217;s indifferent and falls by the wayside.<br />
<br />
She is what could have been the equivalent of Federer, Nadal, or Sampras.  She instead can count her total grand slams on one hand and complains that people don&#8217;t give her the respect she deserves.  I agree with Whitlock in saying that if she perhaps tried as hard, or even cared to try, like Federer has done, Agassi had done, or Sampras, she would be there as the women&#8217;s ambassador for any sport, not just tennis.  It&#8217;s a shame to see talent not put to its full potential.<br />
<br />
But it&#8217;s an even bigger shame to have people criticize a writer for pointing that out.  I am not one that prefers to keep the truth, however ugly, from coming to light in the sports world.  There is a line drawn at the personal life, but as far as their play and the reasons behind great or poor performances, those things need to surface and be discussed.<br />
<br />
In the end, that is the only way there can be effective reporting: fair, balanced and with great debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.26magazine.com/criticism-of-controversy-is-laughable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social networking: To join or not to join</title>
		<link>http://www.26magazine.com/social-networking-to-join-or-not-to-join/</link>
		<comments>http://www.26magazine.com/social-networking-to-join-or-not-to-join/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 19:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging & Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros and cons of social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26magazine.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’re one of the only people left in America that doesn’t have a social networking profile, congratulations! You may be wondering why in the world anyone would be interested in joining a social networking Web site, so let me tell you a little bit about my experiences with them. 
I began my social networking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you’re one of the only people left in America that doesn’t have a social networking profile, congratulations! You may be wondering why in the world anyone would be interested in joining a social networking Web site, so let me tell you a little bit about my experiences with them. </p>
<p>I began my social networking tour with LiveJournal when I was in middle school. There I would tell the world about my love for Joey Fatone (from N’SYNC…duh.) Once in high school, I decided that it was time to move onto MySpace. By that time, my music tastes had changed and I was interested in the MySpace music pages. In college, I was introduced to Facebook, and just recently I joined Twitter. It’s been a long social networking road for me, but I can honestly say there have been times when it’s really helped, though there&#8217;s also been a time when it’s hurt.<br />
<span id="more-139"></span><br />
I’ll lay out some pros and cons for you. You’ll notice that many of the pros and cons are the same because, well, they’re both good and bad. It’s up to you to decide which one. Weigh it out for yourself. </p>
<p><strong>Pros: </strong><br />
1.	When done right, these Web sites can actually get you connected with people of your similar interests.<br />
2.	If you don’t really want to talk to someone in real life, you can always send them a message. It’s better than calling and hoping to reach a voicemail.<br />
3.	If you are creepy, any of these can be assets, and in more ways than you can imagine.<br />
4.	They are a good way to stay connected with friends who live far away.<br />
5.	If you’re smart enough, you can make yourself look like something you’re not.<br />
6.	MySpace and Facebook are constantly in transition. They continue to add new aspects like instant messaging with friends and status updates.<br />
7.	You can connect with people all around the world.<br />
8.	You have your own place in the World Wide Web.<br />
9.	The Internet is not FCC regulated.<br />
10.	It provides companies with a great way to advertise for free.</p>
<p><strong>Cons: </strong><br />
1.	People may try to contact you, thinking that the two of you have similar interests when, indeed, the two of you do not.<br />
2.	When people are mad, it’s a scapegoat to just send a message and not actually work it out face-to-face.<br />
3.	People are creepy.<br />
4.	Friends that you didn’t want to stay connected with will find you.<br />
5.	If you’re smart enough, you can make yourself look like something you’re not.<br />
6.	They are constantly in transition so when you finally get used to one version they switch it around and confuse you again.<br />
7.	People from all around the world can find you.<br />
8.	You have your own place in the World Wide Web where people will always be able to find you.<br />
9.	The Internet is not FCC regulated.<br />
10.	They can be a great place for people to steal identities. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.26magazine.com/social-networking-to-join-or-not-to-join/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to 26Magazine.com!</title>
		<link>http://www.26magazine.com/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.26magazine.com/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging & Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discoveries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.26magazine.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are happy to announce that the all-new 26Magazine.com is finally opening its doors, and not only as a portal to some of the most interesting current news stories and events, but as a host to promoting in-depth discussions of these often controversial topics.

Here, you&#8217;ll find the hot and not-so-hot, cutting edge discoveries, juiciest gossip, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are happy to announce that the all-new 26Magazine.com is finally opening its doors, and not only as a portal to some of the most interesting current news stories and events, but as a host to promoting in-depth discussions of these often controversial topics.<br />
<br />
Here, you&#8217;ll find the hot and not-so-hot, cutting edge discoveries, juiciest gossip, most up-to-date health and lifestyle, hardcore sports and well-informed Internet news. We&#8217;re making our way toward having a little bit of everything.<br />
<br />
Our goal here at 26Magazine.com is to make us your first choice for an alternative view of everyday news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.26magazine.com/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

